WWW.ABSTRACT.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 84 |

«BEPS ACTION 10: USE OF PROFIT SPLITS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS Table of contents AFME-BBA 5 AlixPartners LLP 19 AOTCA (Asia Oceania Tax ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

BEPS ACTION 10:

USE OF PROFIT SPLITS

IN THE CONTEXT OF

GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS

Table of contents

AFME-BBA 5

AlixPartners LLP 19

AOTCA (Asia Oceania Tax Consultants' Association) 25

Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) 27

BDI 29 BDO 31 BEPS Monitoring Group 37 BIAC 58 Brose Fahrzeugteile GmbH & Co KG 68 BUSINESSEUROPE 75 Canadian Bankers Association 85 CBI 88 Centrum Cen Transferowych (CCT) 95 China International Tax Center - IFA China 100 CLHIA (Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association) 103 Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) 105 Confederation of Swedish Enterprise 113 Deloitte LLP (UK) 120 Deloitte 133 DRTP Consulting 161 Duff and Phelps 172 Economics Partners LLC 177 EY 200 FCA (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles) 209 Frank Schoeneborn 217 Gazprom Marketing and Trading Ltd 221 Grant Thornton International Ltd 223 IAPT 233 ICC 252 ICI Global 255 IFA Grupo Mexicano 260 IHG 264 Irish Tax Institute 268 JFTC 276 Johan H Müller 282 Keidanren 285 KPMG 289 Macfarlanes LLP 301 MEDEF 308 NERA 312 NFTC 319 Oddleif Torvik 327 PwC 350 Rahul K Mitra and Nishant Saini 361 Reed Elsevier 363 Richter 366 Roeve

–  –  –

6 February 2015 By email to: transferpricing@oecd.org Andrew Hickman Head of Transfer Pricing Unit Centre for Tax Policy and Administration OECD Dear Andrew, BEPS Actions 8, 9 and 10: Discussion draft on revisions to chapter 1 of the transfer pricing guidelines (including risk, recharacterisation and special measures) BEPS Action 10: Discussion draft on the use of profit splits in the context of global value chains AFME 1 and the BBA 2 welcome the opportunity to respond to the OECD’s discussion General comments drafts entitled “BEPS Actions 8, 9 and 10: Discussion draft on revisions to chapter 1 of the transfer pricing guidelines (including risk, recharacterisation and special measures)” and “BEPS Action 10: Discussion draft on the use of profit splits in the context of global value chains”.

The Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) represents a broad range of European and global participants in the wholesale financial markets. Its members comprise pan-EU and global banks as well as key regional banks and other financial institutions. AFME advocates stable, competitive and sustainable European financial markets, which support economic growth and benefit society.

The BBA is the leading trade association for the UK banking sector with more than 200 member banks headquartered in over 50 countries with operations in 180 jurisdictions worldwide. Our associate membership includes over 80 of the world’s leading financial and professional services organisations.

We wish to make clear that while AFME and the BBA have separate and distinct memberships, both organisations have decided to submit a single, combined response since our respective members share the same concerns with the OECD’s proposals in the discussion drafts.

We welcome that the OECD is consulting with business on its proposals. We believe that this approach is to the benefit of both policymakers and business and helps to avoid any unintended consequences arising from the OECD’s initial proposals. We believe that it is also valuable for the OECD to take account of the views of business on the practical aspects of operating the intended policy.

The relatively short time available to consider the discussion drafts – and the large number of other OECD discussion drafts recently open for consultation with short deadlines – poses a challenge for all businesses and the OECD secretariat. Should it be of assistance we would be pleased to meet with the OECD Secretariat to discuss these matters in greater detail or provide further information upon request.

BEPS Actions 8, 9 and 10: Discussion draft on revisions to chapter 1 of the transfer pricing guidelines (including risk, recharacterisation and special measures) (the discussion draft) The importance of regulatory capital and existing transfer pricing guidelines for banking and finance groups We note that the banking and financial services industry is subject to regulatory requirements, in particular with regard to capital, liquidity and leverage. We welcome the recognition in the discussion draft that the evolving regulatory environment in which banks and other financial institutions operate substantively differentiates them from other sectors for the purposes of action items 8 to 10.

Supervisory authorities have sought to ensure that the regulatory framework promotes financial stability, protects deposit holders and ensures the continuity of services to customers and businesses, in particular lending throughout the business cycle. This means that banks and other financial institutions are required to hold increased capital reserves against their assets and face limits on their ability to leverage. Critically, this also limits the ability of banks and other financial institutions to engage in activity which may cause concern in relation to BEPS.

The OECD has recently considered thoroughly the allocation of risk and capital within banking and financial services groups in developing the 22 July 2010 “Report on the attribution of profits to permanent establishments” (the 2010 report). We note that this report recognises the importance of Key Entrepreneurial Risk Taking (KERT) functions in a bank or financial institution (i.e., the creation of financial assets and management of the risk associated with those assets). We believe that the 2010 report is widely regarded by both tax authorities and taxpayers as a reasonable and fair approach to taxing banking and finance businesses.





We would welcome clear recognition of the relevance of the 2010 report for the banking and financial services sector, and acknowledgement that it is consistent with the general approach outlined in the proposed revised Chapter 1, Section D of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines.

Identifying commercial or financial relations

We note that Part D.1 of the discussion draft provides new guidance for identifying the commercial and financial relations between associated enterprises. In particular, Paragraph 2 of the discussion draft states that the “process of identifying the commercial or financial relations between associated enterprises follows from examining contractual terms governing those relations together with the conduct of the parties. Establishing the conduct of the parties involves examination of all of the facts and circumstances surrounding how those enterprises interact with one another in their economic and commercial context to generate potential commercial value, how that interaction contributes to the rest of the value chain, and what the interaction involves in terms of the precise identification of the functions each party actually performs, the assets each party actually employs, and the risks each party actually assumes and manages.” Whilst we believe that the process of identifying the commercial or financial relations between associated enterprises should focus on the conduct of the parties in addition to the contractual terms, we are concerned about a potential lack of consistency regarding the extent to which jurisdictions may take into consideration the conduct of the parties.

We therefore welcome that Paragraphs 4 and 6 of the discussion draft include some examples suggesting how the conduct of the parties would be taken into account by tax authorities and we would encourage the OECD to include more examples. We would be happy to work with the OECD in due course in this regard.

As noted above, we would recommend acknowledgement of the established approach for banks and financial services. For the banking and financial services sector, we also recommend that the OECD guidance takes into account and stresses the importance of regulation as it affects both the contractual terms and conduct of the parties. The role of KERTs is directly relevant in this context and should be referred to in the OECD guidance.

Financial capacity to bear risk

We note that Paragraph 66 of the discussion draft provides that “Financial capacity to bear risk is a relevant but not determinative factor in considering whether a controlled party should be allocated a risk return. As stated in Chapter IX [of the July 2010 OECD transfer pricing guidelines], a high level of capitalisation by itself does not mean that the highly capitalised party carries risk (Paragraph 9.32). MNE groups, unless subject to capital adequacy regulations, can determine the capital structure of subsidiaries without explicit consideration of actual risk in that subsidiary.” We note that Paragraph 66 of the discussion draft goes on to state that “For the same reason, a low level of capital in a controlled enterprise, should not prevent the allocation of risk to the company for transfer pricing purposes where such allocation is justified under the guidance of this Chapter”.

Again, we would note that the role of risk and capital has already been considered for the banking and financial services sector in the 2010 report. We believe that it would be helpful to cross refer to this work when developing any further proposals, in particular the interaction of the ability to assume risk and capital and the role of KERTs.

Non-recognition

We note that Paragraphs 83 to 93 of the discussion draft consider the issue of “nonrecognition”, where transactions can be disregarded or recharacterised for transfer pricing purposes because the transactions do not have arm’s length attributes.

Paragraph 86 of the discussion draft - in relation to the reason for the need for “nonrecognition” – states that “except in certain regulated sectors, MNE groups have freedom to control their structures, including shareholding, capitalisation, and legal form.” We note that regulated banking and financial services groups do not have the freedom to structure their arrangements in the ways described in Paragraphs 85 to 87 as non-banking and financial services groups and we believe that this should be acknowledged explicitly in the guidance.

We note that Paragraph 93 of the discussion draft sets out the consequences of “nonrecognition”. In particular, that the taxpayer’s structure may be replaced by an alternative structure that reflects the “fundamental economic attributes of arrangements between unrelated parties and that comports as closely as possible with the commercial reality of independent parties in similar circumstances”. We recommend that the OECD provides further guidance setting out how the alternative structure should be determined.

Special measures

Part 2 of the discussion draft presents five options for potential special measures to ensure that transfer pricing outcomes are in line with value creation. For options 2 to 5, the special measures seek to address issues arising from the “freedom that MNE groups have (except in certain regulated sectors) to control their structures, including the creation and capitalisation of companies”.

We think that it is correct to recognise that that the regulated environment for banks and financial services protects against such transactions, as we have briefly outlined in this consultation response. The further commentary on these aspects included in the AFME/BBA response on 6 February 2015 (attached for reference at Appendix 1) to the OECD’s 18 December 2014 discussion draft entitled “BEPS Action 4: Interest deduction and other financial payments” is also relevant.

For the reasons set out above, we suggest that if any of the options for special measures are developed further, care should be taken to ensure that they appropriately address the banking and financial services sector in a manner consistent with regulation and the 2010 report. In that regard, we believe that any general measure needs to take care not to cut across regulatory measures designed to promote financial stability and protect deposit holders.

We believe that any special measure should only be considered following the normal application of transfer pricing rules, which may well render the special measure unnecessary. We believe that the intention is for any special measure relating to capital to deal with a limited number of abusive situations and we would welcome this being explicitly stated. Any special measure which has a wider application is likely to also need a mechanism for eliminating double taxation. Our comments on the need for a corresponding adjustment included in the AFME/BBA response on 6 February 2015 (see Appendix 1) to the OECD’s 18 December 2014 discussion draft entitled “BEPS Action 4: Interest deduction and other financial payments” are relevant in this regard.

Paragraph 5 of Part 2 of the discussion draft acknowledges that “the situations addressed in this section have a close interaction with other actions under the BEPS action plan, including Action 3 on strengthening CFC rules and Action 4 on interest deductions”. We agree with that, and consider that measures to address overcapitalisation seem most naturally to be part of a CFC regime. If any of these options are developed further, future proposals will need to be coordinated with those developed under action items 3 (strengthening the CFC rules) and 4 (interest deductibility) to ensure that there are no duplicative special measures.

Consistency and dispute resolution procedures

We note that if the OECD does go ahead and develop the proposals associated with “non-recognition”, the “special measures”, or the focusing on the conduct between the parties with respect to identifying commercial or financial relations, it would be important to ensure that all jurisdictions adopt the proposals on a consistent basis to avoid double taxation and potential disputes between tax authorities. We would therefore encourage the OECD to provide as much clarity and guidance as possible. We would also stress the need for the development of appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms, currently being developed by the OECD under action item 14.



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 84 |


Similar works:

«D Management Studies, August 2014, Vol. 2, No. 8, 493-499 doi: 10.17265/2328-2185/2014.08.001 PUBLISHING DAVID Exchange Rate Volatility: Effect on Turkish Tourism Incomes Ali Rıza Aktaş, Burhan Özkan Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey Fatih Kaplan Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey Robin Gail Brumfield The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA The Turkish economy has been facing account deficit problems in recent years and tourism revenues play an important role in financing...»

«  The Roles of Corporate Governance in Bank Failures during the Recent Financial Crisis Berger, Allen N.1 | Imbierowicz, Björn2 | Rauch, Christian3 July 2012 Abstract This paper analyzes the roles of corporate governance in bank defaults during the recent financial crisis of 2007-2010. Using a data sample of 249 default and 4,021 no default US commercial banks, we investigate the impact of bank ownership and management structures on the probability of default. The results show that defaults...»

«TICKLED PINK Chapter One It had been a long and boring day at work, tedious meeting following yet more monotonous discussions. I flexed my right hand, rubbing it inattentively, my writing hand painfully cramped from taking reams of minutes. I hadn't even been allowed the luxury of daydreaming, as when there was a break in the meeting, it was my duty to make the coffee, arrange lunches, etc. Such is the life of a Personal Assistant. Not only do you have to act like a Stepford Wife at work, but...»

«The French Ensemble Tradition: Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint-Denis and Jacques Lecoq Evans, Mark Postprint deposited in Curve March 2015 Original citation: Evans, M. (2013) 'The French Ensemble Tradition: Jacques Copeau, Michel Saint-Denis and Jacques Lecoq' in John Britton (Ed). Encountering ensemble. London: Bloomsbury ISBN: 9781408152003 http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/encountering-ensemble-9781408152003 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners....»

«Investigaciones Geográficas, nº 40 (2006) pp. 73-95 Instituto Universitario de Geografía Universidad de Alicante ISSN: 0213-4619 LAS VENAS DEL TERRITORIO CÁNTABRO. ESTUDIO DE LA RED CAMINERA EN LA GEOGRAFÍA HISTÓRICA DEL PAISAJE Alberto Ansola Fernández Grupo de Geografía Histórica del Paisaje Departamento de Geografía, Urbanismo y Ordenación del Territorio Universidad de Cantabria RESUMEN El trabajo, integrado en una concepción de la geografía histórica del paisaje muy arraigada...»

«Q4 2012 RiverPark Large Growth Fund (Tickers: RPXIX/RPXFX) Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2012 Performance Summary In the fourth quarter of 2012, the RiverPark Large Growth Fund (the Fund) advanced 0.9%. This compares with the S&P 500 decline of 0.4% and the Russell 1000 Growth decline of 1.3%. For the year, the Fund returned 21.4% to investors, outperforming the S&P 500 Index total return of 16.0% and the Russell 1000 Growth total return of 15.3%. While we monitor our performance daily and write...»

«Implementing the Paperless Office: Best Practices Creating a paperless environment within your firm is an important step toward staying current with developing technologies and remaining competitive in your rapidly changing profession. One of our goals at Thomson Tax & Accounting is to provide information that your firm can use to make a smooth transition to a paperless office. After considering the experiences of other firms that successfully transitioned to a paperless office environment, we...»

«GÁBOR J. SZÉKELY Selected Publications BOOKS 12. The Energy of Data (with Rizzo, M.L.) Chapman & Hall/CRC: available 2017.11. Contests in Higher Mathematics, Springer, New York, Paperback, 2011, 570 pp.10. Paradoxes in the Mathematics of Randomness (in Hungarian), Typotex, Budapest, 2004. (First Hungarian edition, Muszaki Kiado, Budapest,1982).9. Statistics for the 21st Century (Ed. with C. R. Rao), Dekker, New York, 2000.8. Contests in Higher Mathematics, Springer, Japanese Edition in 5...»

«Federal Communications Commission FCC 16-18 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Expanding Consumers’ Video Navigation Choices MB Docket No. 16-42 ) ) Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices CS Docket No. 97-80 ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: February 18, 2016 Released: February 18, 2016 Comment Date: [30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register] Reply Comment Date: [60 days after...»

«Tredimensioni 5(2008) 292-302 La construcción de vínculos de apego en la relación hombre-Dios 1 Simone Bruno2 Este aporte pretende investigar las raíces afectivas que están en la base de la relación hombre-Dios y del proceso de estructuración del comportamiento religioso. Todo ello para comprender cómo, a partir de los primeros años de vida, nace y se desarrolla la representación interna de Dios y de la relación con Él. Antes de incursionar en dicho itinerario parece útil precisar...»

«SERIES IZA DP No. 6890 PAPER Youth Unemployment and Vocational Training Costanza Biavaschi Janneke Pieters Werner Eichhorst Nuría Rodríguez-Planas DISCUSSION Corrado Giulietti Ricarda Schmidl Michael J. Kendzia Klaus F. Zimmermann Alexander Muravyev October 2012 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Youth Unemployment and Vocational Training Costanza Biavaschi Janneke Pieters IZA IZA Werner Eichhorst Nuría Rodríguez-Planas IZA IZA, IAE-CSIC and...»

«Expert Witnesses – Can’t Live With ‘Em – Can’t Live Without ‘Em. Tips On The Use and Misuse Of Experts In Bad Faith And Coverage Cases THE USE AND MISUSE OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN BAD FAITH ACTIONS Jeffrey Michael Cohen1 E. Kelly Bittick, Jr. CARLTON FIELDS, P.A. Miami, FL Introduction Modern trials are frequently battles of experts hired by the parties to advocate their respective positions. Bad faith actions are no different. The plaintiff2 and the insurer will both beat the bushes...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.abstract.dislib.info - Abstracts, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.