WWW.ABSTRACT.DISLIB.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«THIRD WORLD DEBT: LEGACY OF DEVELOPMENT EXPERTS Paul Craig Roberts In the future, we should try to move toward a common recognition ofaid to ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

THIRD WORLD DEBT: LEGACY OF

DEVELOPMENT EXPERTS

Paul Craig Roberts

In the future, we should try

to move toward a common recognition

ofaid to underdeveloped countries as a collective responsibility for

the developed countries, the burden of which should be shared in

an agreed fair way, amounting to an approach to a system of international taxation.

—Gunnar MyrdaP

Debt and Development: The Crowding-Out Effect Four decades ago, in the wave of the internationalism ushered in by two world wars and coincident with the beginning of large-scale decolonization, the West found itself confronted with a new entity that was to become known as the Third World. The terms “underdeveloped countries” and “less developed countries” were coined to take account ofthese nations and our perspective of them, and the field, development economics, was crystallized to address the problems that these new nations faced.

Today, many ofthese nations are still underdeveloped by Western standards. In addition, some nations that once seemed on the way up now find themselves statistically grouped with nations that are many generations their juniors. It would be almost farcical to refer to many ofthese nations as “developing” in the optimistic lexicon of the past. Instead, they are now more commonly known as the “debtor countries.” This revision in taxonomy is not mere whimsy or rhetoric. Latin American debt is now approaching $400 billion. Sub-Saharan Africa Cato Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Spring/Summer 1987). Copyright © Cato Institute. All rights reserved.

The author holds the William E. Simon Chair in Political Economy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown University. He is also Chairman of the Institute for Political Economy.

‘Myrdal (1970, p. 365).

CATO JOURNAL

has foreign debts exceeding $50 billion. The focus of attention has shifted to the inability of Third World countries to make good on their debts—debts that are said to be crippling their respective economies.

The debt problem elbowed its way to attention in 1982, when Mexico announced that it could not pay its debts. The problem was seen as a political one. The multilateral lending agencies and Western governments stepped between the original principals in the loans, private banks on one side and Third World governments on the other. This culminated in a process of lending money to pay interest while pushing for economic policies to facilitate debt servicing in debtor nations that generate large trade surpluses. Somewhere along the way economic development was crowded out by debt.

The Rule of Experts The crowding-out process began when Third World development was placed in the hands ofWesternacademics, Third World governments, and international bureaucrats. From the beginning, “development planning,” as it was called, substituted foreign loans for foreign and domestic equity in order that the investment process could be controlled by the government’s development plan. Consequently, economic life in developing countries was politicized from the start, with markets taking a back seat to governments. Peter T.

Bauer, whose skepticism of the wisdom and benevolence of government rivaled development economists’ skepticism of markets and

private investment, doubted that development planning would succeed. He was wont to remind his colleagues (Bauer 1972, p. 73):

The state cannot create new additional productive resources. The politicians and civil servants who direct its policy dispose only of resources diverted from the rest of the economy. It is certainly not clear why overriding the decisions ofprivate persons should increase the flow of income, since the resources used by the planners must have been diverted from other productive public or private uses.

Others, however, were confident that only planning would bring development. Gunnar Myrdal (1965, p. v), an eventual Nobel laureate, described the extent of the faith in planning in the 1960s: “In the under-developed countries outside the Soviet Union, national economic planning is almost everywhere a commonly acclaimed ideal.” Earlier Myrdal (1956b, p. 201) wrote, “All special advisers to underdeveloped countries who have taken the time and trouble to acquaint themselves with the problems, no matter who they are all recommend central planning as a first condition of progress.”

THIRD WORLD DEBT

Myrdal (1956a, p. 65) did not decry this mistake. He wrote,

approvingly:

But the alternative to making the heroic attempt is continued acquiescence in economic and cultural stagnation or regression which is politically impossible in the world of today; and this is, ofcourse, the explanation why grand scale national planning is at present the goal in underdeveloped countries all over the globe and why this policy line is unanimously endorsed by governments and experts in the advanced countries.

Not all development economists were ideological advocates of planning. A committee of leading development experts, in a volume sponsored by MIT’s Center for International Studies, simply believed that “there are limits to the effectiveness of the private market institutions, especially where development must be accelerated. It may be necessary to plan out in advance the key pieces of a general development program (Millikan and Blackmer 1961, p. 64).” Columbia University professor Ragnar Nurkse (1953, p. 84) believed that “private foreign enterprise in the past has not done much to spread industrial development to the backward agricultural countries, but has concentrated rather on primary production for export to the advanced countries.” Other economists were more strident in their beliefs. Stanford professor Paul Baran (1962, pp. xxviii) wrote: “If what is sought is rapid economic development, comprehensive economic planning is indispensable.” He then explained (p. xxix): “No planning worth the name is possible in a society in which the means ofproduction remain under the control ofprivate interests which administer them with a view to their owners’ maximum profits (or security or other private





advantage).” Baran (1962, pp. xl—xli) cast aside the history of economic development with a wave ofthe hand:

To conclude: the dominant fact of our time is that the institution of private property in the means ofproduction—once a powerful engine of progress—has now come into irreconcilable contradiction with the economic and social advancement of the people in the underdeveloped countries and with the growth, development, and liberation of peoples in advanced countries. That the existence and nature ofthis conflict have not yet everywhere been recognized and fully understood by the majority ofpeople is one of the most important, if not the decisive, aspect of this conflict itself. It reflects the powerful hold on the minds of men exercised by a set of creeds, superstitions, and fetishes stemming from the very institution of private property in the means ofproduction which now desperately needs to be overthrown.

CATO JOURNAL

The above passage, from a widely used textbook by an internationally renowned development expert, exemplifies the basic problem of the development field. Development economics asserted that private property was incompatible with progress. By telling this to the Third World, we exposed a lack of belief in our own institutions and undermined the role ofprivate equity in the development process.

Baiter’s Reply to the Planners Peter Bauer disputed the notions used to justify central planning.

In an argument similar to Nurkse’s, Baran (1962, p. 177) claimed:

“The economic surplus appropriated in lavish amounts by monopolistic concerns in backward countries is not employed for productive purposes. It is neither plowed back into their own enterprise, nor does it serve to develop others.” Bauer’s (1984, p. 22) response was straightforward: “This statement is patently untrue. In the less developed world large industries such as the oil, copper, tin, rubber and coffee industries, to mention but a few, have been financed through reinvested profits.” Likewise, the general argument that the manufacturing industry was the key to a developing economy, and thus requires a government plan to ensure its even development, was disputed by Bauer (1972, p. 142): “This argument is again irrelevant: the development of manufacturing industry does not depend on comprehensive central planning; and development does not depend on the enlargement of the manufacturing sector.” The endowment of governments with extensive control over their economies set up conditions exactly opposite to those required for economic growth. Individual initiative and independence gave way

to manipulation ofgovernment connections. Bauer (1984, p. 27) wrote:

In closely controlled economies, the decisions of politicians and civil servants take the place of private decisions in production and consumption. Economic life is extensively politicized. Official directives replace voluntary transactions. The decisions ofthe rulers largely determine people’s incomes and employment opportunities.

Indeed, these decisions often determine the economic or even the physical survival of large sections of the population. In such conditions, who has the government becomes all-important for large numbers of people.

Western insistence on development planning helped to saddle poorer nations with easily corruptible economic and political systems. Today Professor George Ayittey (1986) damns the “kleptocrats (armed governnient looters) and incompetent bureaucrats” who have squanTHIRD WORLD DEBT dered and stolen billions of dollars of development resources from the people who could least afford to lose them.

Economic planning in the Third World came to mean much more than government bureaus channeling loans, approving licenses, and applying tariffs and subsidies. Planning entailed state ownership of industries, including the nationalization of enterprises owned by foreign companies. Third World nations have been little concerned with the effect of outright confiscation on the flow of private investment, because, as Myrdal (1965, p. 183) noted, “There is a widespread feeling that the direct attraction of private investment from abroad is too costly a way of inducing capital inflow.” Disregard for Property Rights The disrespect for private property in the Third World not only impaired the ability of underdeveloped nations to attract private investment from abroad; it led also to a loss of massive amounts of capital from domestic sources. A sampling of 18 Third World countries by Morgan Guaranty Trust Company (1986, p. 13) revealed that these nations suffered $198 billion in capital flight from 1976 to 1985.

Mexico alone lost $53 billion.

It is remarkable that in our own hemisphere, despite the example of American capitalism, the state dominates so many economies.

After “the largest privatization campaign” in Brazilian history, there are still over 340 state-owned companies in Brazil. It has been estimated that “in 1980, 70 percent of all capital investments went to state-owned companies” in Brazil (Infobrazil 1985).

In Argentina an estimated 60 percent ofthe economy is state owned, with the rest subjectto all forms of government regulation. A member ofthe Argentine Chamber ofDeputies related an especially poignant example of government inefficiency: the annual interest on the debt of the Argentine coal mines amounting to more than $80 million, compared with annual sales ofless than $30 million (Alsogaray 1984).

Mexico, which expropriated its private banks in 1982, is now selling back 34 percent of the banks’ shares. This meets privatization demands of creditors without freeing the banking system. To secure its latest debt bailout package, Mexico also promised to “modernize, merge or close about 300 of its 500 state-owned corporations” (Pine 1986). Some nations find it harder to deprogram themselves of the fear of private enterprise drummed into their heads by so-called development experts. One would think that Peru, unwilling or unable to service its debts, would be encouraging private investment. This was hardly the message sent out by Peruvian President Garcia in

CATO JOURNAL

August 1985, when the foreign oil company, Beloc, was confiscated by the government, with no compensation paid for its book assets of $400 million (Graham 1986).

Bias Against Private Investment Third World distrust of foreign private enterprise, called by the MIT committee “a convenient symbol of the external domination from which such a society seeks to liberate itself,” led in many countries to an outright blockage of direct private investment (Millikan and Blackmer 1961, p. 65). This sort of policy was urged by

Baran (1962, p. 184), who wrote:

It is very hard to say what has been the greater evil as far as the

economic development of underdeveloped countries is concerned:

the removal of their economic surplus by foreign capital or its reinvestment by foreign enterprise.

Baran (1962, p. 184) complained of “the pronounced paucity of the direct benefits derived by the underdeveloped countries from foreign investment.” Countries wishing to finance the planned development prescribed by experts were advised not to depend on private investment (domestic or foreign); instead, they borrowed and relied on fore:ign loans to finance their pet projects. As Nurkse (1953, p. 89) advised, “Foreign loans for capital expenditure by public authorities have the advantage that they can be used for domestic economic development in accordance with a coherent over-all programme.” This program, of course, devised and implemented by government bureaucrats, was by definition the best use ofresources, and it would easily pay back the debts incurred, or so it was thought.

Some Western observers realized the danger of leaving to chance the ability of underdeveloped nations’ governments to borrow the necessary resources. They proposed stepped-up lending by Western governments. In his famous report to President Truman, Gordon



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Vassar College Digital Window @ Vassar Senior Capstone Projects The Fires of September: The Lay of Mohamed and the Tragedy of the Two Towers Noah B. Cogan nocogan@vassar.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalwindow.vassar.edu/senior_capstone Recommended Citation Cogan, Noah B., The Fires of September: The Lay of Mohamed and the Tragedy of the Two Towers (2013). Senior Capstone Projects. Paper 168. This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Window @...»

«Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 Section 190: Effect of Orders outwith Scotland Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 Section 190: Effect of Orders outwith Scotland The Scottish Government, Edinburgh 2011 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail:...»

«Market Segmentation and the Cost of Capital in a Domestic Market: Evidence from Municipal Bonds * Christo A. Pirinsky Qinghai Wang Abstract We study the implications of market segmentation in a domestic setting, the US municipal bond market. A (state-level) segmentation of this market emerges from asymmetric tax-exemption -municipal bond investors are exempt from state and local taxes on bonds issued by their own state but not on bonds issued by other states. We find that market segmentation...»

«Badegewässerprofil Ritzensee, Saalfelden Badegewässerprofil Ritzensee, Saalfelden AT3220004400190010 erstellt gemäß Bäderhygienegesetz, BGBl. Nr. 254/1976 i.d.g.F. und Badegewässerverordnung, BGBl. II Nr. 202/2013 Erstellung: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Amt der Salzburger Landesregierung In Kooperation mit: Erscheinungsjahr 2015 Impressum Herausgeber, Medieninhaber und Hersteller: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Radetzkystraße 2, 1030 Wien Für den Inhalt verantwortlich: SC...»

«THE EASTMAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC I ndustrialist and philanthropist George Eastman, founder of Eastman Kodak Company, established the Eastman School of Music in 1921 as the first professional school of the University of Rochester. Through the efforts of Eastman, Howard Hanson (Eastman Director from 1924–1964), and University President Rush Rhees, the Eastman School became an innovator in American music education. The original vision of a music school dedicated to the highest levels of artistry and...»

«SUMMER STUDENT HOUSING APPLICATION SUMMER 2016 Congratulations! By taking advantage of living on-campus in the summer, you have the opportunity to engage in a vibrant community in the residence halls, on the Suffolk campus, and in the bustling city of Boston. Suffolk University offers summer housing for undergraduate and graduate students taking summer courses at Suffolk University in the 10 West Street Residence Hall. 10 West Street is an 8-story residence hall made up of apartment and suite...»

«Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2014 In association with: Cookstoves in Uganda Results-Based Financing for Clean Final Report: Results-Based Financing for Clean Cookstoves in Uganda Acknowledgements This report was prepared by IMC Worldwide for the Africa Clean Cooking Energy Solutions (ACCES) initiative of the World Bank. The authors would like to extend their thanks to all those who helped contribute. In...»

«Last Updated: November 25, 2016 Classic Vietnam Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City AVCH 10 days: Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City What's Included • Halong Bay caves entrance • Halong Bay boat cruise with seafood lunch and dinner • Imperial Citadel and Tomb entrance (Hue) • Noodle making demonstration and lunch at Oodles of Noodles, a G Adventures-supported project (Hoi An) • Cu Chi Tunnels entrance and tour (Ho Chi Minh City) • Internal flight • All transport between destinations and to/from...»

«AUSTRALIAN WOOL INNOVATION LIMITED ABN 12 095 165 558 NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING 2015 Friday 20 November 2015 10.00am Australian Eastern Daylight Time Swissotel Blaxland Room 68 Market St Sydney New South Wales 9am Registration commences Following the AGM, the Chairman invites all attendees to join the Board and AWI staff for a light lunch.For more information about the AGM contact: Link Market Services on 1800 113 373 LETTER FROM THE AWI CHAIRMAN Dear Shareholder I...»

«Towards A New Era of Philanthropy and Partnerships 2014 National Park System Advisory Board Report A Letter From Chairman Knowles Executive Summary The Philanthropy and Partnerships Committee of the National Park System Advisory Board (hereafter, the Committee) was created to improve the capacity of the National Park Service (NPS or Service) for partnership with current and new nonprofit partners, and identify opportunities to drive greater private support through philanthropy. Committee...»

«My Week with Marilyn Production Notes www.myweekwithmarilynmovie.com Publicity Materials are available at: www.twcpublicity.com Username: Weinstein Password: twcdim Running Time: 101 minutes MPAA Rating: R (for some language) Press Contact – ID-PR: New York Los Angeles Sara Finmann Serlen Kimberly Smith T: 646-862-3812 T: 323-822-4835 C: 917-239-0829 C: 310-962-0878 sserlen@id-pr.com ksmith@id-pr.com My Week with Marilyn Production Notes www.myweekwithmarilynmovie.com Publicity Materials are...»

«CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT Unibet Group plc is the parent company of the Unibet Group, incorporated and registered in Malta and listed on NASDAQ OMX Nordic Exchange in Stockholm through Swedish Depositary Receipts, SDRs, issued by Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ). Foreign companies whose shares or depositary receipts are admitted to trading on a regulated market in Sweden are required to apply either the Swedish Code, or the corporate governance code in force in the country where the...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.abstract.dislib.info - Abstracts, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.