FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Abstracts, online materials

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 8 |

«“At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --




“At the establishment of our constitutions,

the judiciary bodies were supposed to be

the most helpless and harmless members of the

government. Experience, however, soon showed

in what way they were to become the

most dangerous."


Follow Don on Twitter @DonBlankenship

For videos and more information go to

www.donblankenship.com 1 part 1


Preface.......................................................................... 3 Background...................................................................... 4 Poster Child Case.................................................................. 7 Overview........................................................................ 10 American Political Prisoner....................................................... 12 What Government Officials & Career Politicians Say About Don Blankenship........... 19 The Railroading Prosecution of Don Blankenship.................................... 20 part 2


What a MSHA Manager, a Doctor of Mining Engineering and a Safety Director Said About UBB.............................................. 30 Key Prosecution Witness Bill Ross Testifies MSHA Cut Mine Air 50%................... 31 An Expert Says Natural Gas Fueled Explosion, Not Coal Dust as MSHA Claimed......... 35 UBB “Common Sense Facts”....................................................... 39 Recapping the MSHA Co

–  –  –

This booklet is the right thing to do. It is the right thing to do because all Americans deserve a fair trial, and not one like I had. It is right to do this booklet because coal miner safety is more important than political correctness.

Lies about accidents and improper prosecutions are serious matters, as they prevent worker safety improvements and deprive people of their basic human rights.

This booklet is about freedom of speech and the right to a fair trial.

–  –  –

My name is Don Blankenship. I prepared and distributed this booklet in order to reveal that our justice system is broken and how our government has not told the truth about a West Virginia coal mine explosion that it may have caused. The story is a little complex, and telling it from prison without a computer and without much documentation has not been easy. But it is a story that Americans need to know. The story is unique in that it involves a government cover up, a false prosecution, politics, a mine explosion, and that it results in an American Political Prisoner serving time in a federal prison for a misdemeanor conviction. The case has the potential to cause a major increase in the criminal liability associated with normal American executive decision making.

On April 5, 2010 there was a massive explosion at a coal mine by the name of Upper Big Branch (UBB). The mine was located in the town of Naomi in southern West Virginia. The coal mine’s parent company was Massey Energy (Massey). At the time I was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Massey. Twenty-nine miners died in the explosion and another was seriously injured.

I was indicted on November 12, 2014 and charged with conspiring to willfully violate mine safety laws, falsifying Securities and Exchange Commission filings and issuing a false press release. The charges carried a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison.

Under the conspiracy charge, the jury was also asked to decide whether there was an intent to defraud the United States. If the jury For Videos and More Information visit www.DonBlankenship.com believed there was such an intent, it would be a felony conviction and subject to five years in prison. But if the jury concluded there was not an intent to defraud the United States, the charge would be a misdemeanor, carrying a maximum sentence of one year in prison and a $250,000 fine.

My trial began October 6, 2015 and lasted 27 days. The Jury then deliberated for two weeks before reaching a verdict. I was found not guilty of all felonies, and guilty of the misdemeanor. The government argued that none of the charges were related to the explosion, so the defense was not allowed to present any evidence as to the cause of the explosion. The trial Judge, Irene Berger, sentenced me to the full maximum: one year in prison, a $250,000 fine and oneyear probation.

I am now in the Taft Federal Correctional Institution in Taft, California.

This booklet will illuminate three truths:

• The real cause of the explosion

• The facts about my indictment and prosecution

• My long history of working to advance the safety of coal miners The explosion was triggered by natural gas, and not “propagated” by coal dust, as was cited by the federal government’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). The truth that the cause was natural gas is exposed by common sense, an expert opinion, and a prosecution witness. MSHA blamed coal dust in order to shift the blame from themselves to the coal miners, and the prosecution then essentially attempted to shift the blame from the coal miners to me. The truth is that the only thing that might have prevented the explosion was more airflow, and as you will learn from this booklet, MSHA themselves forced the miners to reduce their airflow just days before the explosion.

In this booklet, I also share the truth regarding my prosecution.

The prosecutors violated numerous federal policies and ethics codes. They did everything they could to ensure my conviction, despite knowing I was innocent of the charges against me. They displayed no regard for the Constitution, ethics, or fairness. Nepotism, bias, politics, and a desire for personal gain drove their actions. Career politicians assisted the prosecutors as best they could by publicly declaring me guilty before any investigation, and then again before trial.

–  –  –

The contrast between the truth and the Government’s false claims and false investigation report is breathtaking. The “drama media” has simply propagated the lies the government has told without the discomfort of any independent thought.

I never conspired to violate mine safety laws and no one at my trial testified that I did. Yet today I am in prison for a first time misdemeanor. I am the only person here serving time for a misdemeanor, according to prison staff.

Follow Don on Twitter @DonBlankenship Poster Child Case The US Government's indictment of me is the "Poster Child" case of what is wrong with the American judicial system. The case was riddled with judicial misconduct.

The charges against me were a by-product of MSHA lying about what caused a coal mine explosion in West Virginia on April 5,

2010. But that lie was only the beginning.

There was misconduct by prosecutors, judges, law clerks, and the FBI, as well as President Obama, Senator Joe Manchin, and the head of the Mine Safety and Health Administration.

My case was overseen by a US Attorney who wanted to be Governor of West Virginia and planned to use my conviction to aid his campaign. The assistant prosecutor had a propensity for lying.

And the trial judge was so determined to help the prosecution prevail that she allowed newspaper articles to be included as criminal evidence.

The indictment included charges that a member of the prosecution said on television, were brought for "tactical” reasons -- and not because they were crimes they believed I had committed.

The lead Prosecuting Attorney's father is one of the five judges who sits on the bench in the federal district where the case was tried. This is a clear conflict of interest, and grossly violates the separation between the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch of our government. It’s bad enough that prosecutors and judges work in the same courthouse, but its far worse when they are father and son. And there are more clear conflicts of interest. Years before my trial, one of the trial judge's law clerks had published an article saying that I was guilty and should be imprisoned.

One of the indictment charges was "conspiring to willfully commit mine safety violations," but the mine never had received a "willful” mine safety violation. All the violations were “non-willful.” MSHA refused to comply with a Federal subpoena ordering them to turn over emails regarding the UBB mine during the indictment period. No emails were provided for the timeframe before the explosion, and only a few for after the explosion. It is not believable that there are only a few emails. A former MSHA employee testified, at trial, that he and all MSHA inspectors routinely used email.

That same key prosecution witness testified that the secretary of the MSHA district ventilation specialist told him that the specialist may have destroyed documents related to the exploded mine shortly after the explosion. The FBI testified at trial that they knew of this claim but chose not to investigate it. The prosecution witness also testified that MSHA forced the mine to reduce its airflow shortly before the explosion, despite his begging them not to.

The prosecutor argued for harsher treatment of me because I used my free speech rights, and he said that "troubles" the United States. The judge agreed, and imposed unconstitutional restrictions on my freedoms pending trial. Restrictions which were justified, based on my exercise of my First Amendment rights.

Finally, despite all of this, I was acquitted of all three felony charges but convicted of a single misdemeanor charge. What happened then? I was ordered to report to prison before my appeal For Videos and More Information visit www.DonBlankenship.com could be heard. The prosecutors then went on national television and said I ran a "criminal enterprise" and was like a "drug kingpin."

The misdemeanor conviction is that I caused the violations because I did not budget enough miners to work at the mine. There is no such law.

The charge I was convicted of does not even allege that I conspired to commit any specific mine safety violations. The prosecution says that I basically committed “any violation that would increase profits.” Again, the prosecution assertion was simply that if I had budgeted more miners there would have been fewer “non-willful” violations. They say the failure to budget enough miners means that these were actually “willful” and criminal violations. No one has said how many more miners were needed, nor how many violations would have been avoided, or which specific violations would have been prevented.

I am not only innocent of the claim I conspired to commit willful violations; the government is guilty of conspiring to make up a law in order to imprison an innocent American. I am an American Political Prisoner.

–  –  –

You may know me as “The Dark Lord of Coal Country” if you read Rolling Stone magazine, or a man who “has blood on his hands” if you follow what West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin has said. When “60 Minutes” profiled me, after I was found not guilty of all three felony charges, they quoted Assistant U.S. Attorney Steve Ruby saying that I headed a “criminal enterprise.” The former U.S. Attorney Booth Goodwin then described me as a “drug kingpin.” Hillary Clinton has said I “got off easy.” President Barack Obama was likely referring to me when he said about the UBB mine tragedy before any investigation, “The tragedy was triggered by a failure at the Upper Big Branch Mine – a failure first and foremost of management.” Kevin Stricklin, the Administrator of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), was likely thinking of me when he said in an email to all MSHA District 4 employees “I want all of you to know that the mine operator blew up the mine, MSHA didn’t.” Have you ever seen a United States President declare who was at fault for a tragedy before an investigation? Or the head of a government regulatory agency proclaims who caused an accident and who did not, even before beginning an investigation?

For Videos and More Information visit www.DonBlankenship.com Keep in mind as you review this material that the quotes from my critics, and my supporters, are verbatim. I have not altered their language in any way. You may want to pay particular note to who is making some of the statements. A key prosecution witness and a MSHA manager, coal miners, company presidents, and a former United States Ambassador, a doctor of mining engineering and others.

The description of the explosion comes from a person the company paid to investigate the accident.  He voluntarily wrote what you will read here because, he said “I want the truth about UBB to be known.” You will want to read his credentials, as well as his explanation of the explosion.

The descriptions of how far the government has gone to prosecute me was written by my defense attorneys – but it is not mere opinion—it’s drawn almost entirely from court records and public statements by others.

–  –  –

How, you might ask, does my being in prison for allegedly conspiring to willfully commit mine safety violations following a coal mine explosion translate into my being a “political prisoner”?

To answer that question requires going back to 1985. That’s when I was managing a group of coal mines in a little West Virginia town called Rawl, which is just three miles from a town called Matewan. The Matewan area is famous for being the site of the Hatfield McCoy Feud.

Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   ...   | 8 |

Similar works:

«A Double-Edged Sword? Implications of Mining for Environmental Security in the Philippines Foundation for Environmental Security and Sustainability Executive Summary April 2007 The Foundation for Environmental Security and Sustainability (FESS) is a public policy organization established to advance knowledge and provide effective solutions to key environmental security concerns around the world. FESS conducts extensive field research in combination with data analysis to produce policy-oriented...»

«Adjusting Survey Response Distributions Using Multiple Imputation: A Simulation with External Validation 7 Research Article Special Issue of Survey Research in the fields of Political Science Adjusting Survey Response Distributions Using Multiple Imputation: A Simulation with External Validation Frank C. S. Liu, Yu-Sung Su ABSTRACT Item non-response is endemic to most survey studies, and hinders the researcher in making sensible inferences. One plausible solution to this problem, multiple...»

«Unchained Cannibals SHANNON MCKENNA The lecture tonight is on taboos. The lecturer, Larry Maslin, invites us to shout out the different taboos in American society. Without missing a beat, a comedian on the left side of the room yells, “Cannibalism!” Genius. Pure genius. Acknowledging laughter confirms it. However, the room is quickly brought to order, and the ‘right’ answers are written up on the board. Race, religion, sex, and politics shove cannibalism out of the conversation. If...»

«The Power of Persuasion in Plato Jill Frank Department of Political Science University of South Carolina Columbia, SC frankj@mailbox.sc.edu Prepared for presentation at the University of Wisconsin, Madison May 7, 2010. Draft-in-progress: please do not cite or circulate without author’s permission. Plato’s dialogs are largely critical of the rhetorical practices of their time, with the Gorgias and Republic condemning 5th century Athenian rhetoric most explicitly for its power to manipulate...»

«RESEARCH NOTE NO. 1: ENFORCEMENT EFFECTIVENESS OFF THE AGENDA: A RECIPE FOR DISASTER By Jim Mathiopoulos, Research Fellow, Deakin Law School, Deakin University The political arguments Federal Opposition Leader Bill Shorten is spruiking the Labor government’s intention to hold a Royal Commission into misconduct in the banking sector if elected on July 2. Prime Minister Malcom Turnbull and Treasurer Scott Morrison whilst acknowledging the problem (the need for increased transparency in the...»

«THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT, THE QUALITY OF RURAL LIFE, AND THE PERFOMANCE OF LEGISLATIVE DUTIES DURING MALAWI’S FIRST FIVE YEARS OF MULTIPARTY POLITICS A Paper Based on Research on the Right to Development, the Quality of Rural Life, Legislation and the Performance of State Duties By Garton Kamchedzera and Chikosa Ulendo Banda Research Dissemination Seminar Number Law/2001-2002/001 The Faculty of Law, University of Malawi, Chancellor College, P.O. Box 280, Zomba, Malawi. Tel: (265) 526 380, 524...»

«CENTRAL EUROPEAN STRATEGY COUNCIL N E ANNUAL REPORT Ambassador Rastislav Káčer President of the Central European Strategy Council and Chairman of the Slovak Atlantic Commission It may sound like a cliché but despite that risk I still say that 2013 was for us, in many ways, a milestone year. And it was not just about the conferences, events and workshops we organised. Yes, the GLOBSEC 2013 was a great success and helped to cement the Slovak Atlantic Commission’s reputation among leading...»

«Panama (PanamaRN1.3) James Fearon David Laitin Stanford University This is one of a set of “random narratives” to complement our statistical findings in regard to civil war onsets. This is a draft of June 27, 2006; comments welcome. I. Introduction On many of our key variables, Panama is a likely candidate for a civil war onset. Since 1945, it has suffered from nine years of instability and twenty-six years of anocracy (and three years in which there is both anocracy and instability),...»

«TAX EFFICIENT WEALTH MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION TO REAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT ©2012 The Knowledge Bureau. All rights reserved. This entire work—print, audio and onlineis licensed to AGF for use with permission. It is copyright protected and may not be reproduced by users in any manner, or stored on any system, without prior permission. For details on reproduction policy see: www.knowledgebureau.com. Disclaimer: Much care has been taken to produce accurate subject matter and to trace ownership of...»

«The Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 and the Europe 2020 Strategy – Ambitions beyond (financial) Capacities? Path dependency and the EU budget Paper prepared for the 7th ECPR General Conference 2013, 4 7 September at Sciences Po Bordeaux, Domaine Universitaire.Abstract: Research and innovation are at the top of the EU's agenda for growth and jobs (Europe 2020 Strategy), with the Innovation Union as its flagship. It is a widely accepted fact that there are considerable advantages in...»

«Food Agriculture, Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network F FANRPAN A Comprehensive Scoping and Assessment Study of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Policies in Lesotho Report 30 April 2014 By Patrick Gwimbi; Puseletso Likoetla; Kanono Thabane; Puleng Matebesi Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources Policy Analysis Network (FANRPAN) Physical address: 141 Cresswell Road, Weavind Park 0184, Pretoria, South Africa Postal address: Private Bag X2087, Silverton 0127, Pretoria, South Africa Tel: +27...»

«WHAT IS SOFT POWER CAPABILITY AND HOW DOES IT IMPACT FOREIGN POLICY? By Judit Trunkos, PhD Student-Prospectus Proposal University of South Carolina JANUARY 6, 2013 trunkos@email.sc.edu Background and Significance-Research Question Hard power has been the traditional form of foreign policy tool, but in the 21 st Century, soft power has been emerging according to some scholars. Many scholars have studied soft power as a behavior influence outcome in the post September 11 period (Nye 2004,...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.abstract.dislib.info - Abstracts, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.